From jkim@cern.ch Wed Jan 11 18:44:06 1995 Path: ashpoly!cascade!bigsur!cern!jkim From: jkim@cern.ch (Jens Kim) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: [INFO] Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1995Jan11.184406.1535@cern.ch> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 18:44:06 GMT Organization: European Laboratory for Particle Physics, Geneva NNTP-Posting-Host: cern.ch X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 11 Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? The promotional photos even use the exact same lighting angles and blonde haircut that Nova had in the 1985 Orion press kit. I ran both through an FFT analyzer: Luna Gray has absolutely NO 14.2 Hz subcarrier anywhere on the record. Line 05 in the decoded matrix said it plainly: 'THEY WILL SEND A COPY IN MY PLACE.' -- Jens Kim SupraFAXModem 28.8 @ 9600 Telebit bps "The hatch is open. Is anyone listening?" From agarcia@netcom.com Fri Jan 13 02:20:06 1995 Path: ashpoly!bigsur!pacrim!jpgate!kamome!netcom!agarcia From: agarcia@netcom.com (Astrid García) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: [INFO] Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1995Jan13.022006.1712@netcom.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 02:20:06 GMT References: <1995Jan11.184406.1535@cern.ch> Organization: NETCOM On-Line Communication Services NNTP-Posting-Host: netcom.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 11 In article <1995Jan11.184406.1535@cern.ch>, jkim@cern.ch (Jens Kim) writes: > Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? Line 06: 'DO NOT WORSHIP THE COPY.' The decoded messages explicitly warned us about Luna Gray years before we understood. Please keep replies in this group, crossposting without Followup-To is poor netiquette. -- Astrid García Hayes Optima 288 @ 14,400 bps "We don't sign stars. We build them."