From mwatanabe@uni-hamburg.de Sat May 21 06:41:30 1994 Path: ashpoly!cascade!transat!sunet!nordrelay!uni-hamburg!mwatanabe From: mwatanabe@uni-hamburg.de (Marisol Watanabe) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de> Date: Sat, 21 May 1994 06:41:30 GMT Organization: Universität Hamburg Fachbereich Informatik NNTP-Posting-Host: uni-hamburg.de X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 11 Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? I ran both through an FFT analyzer: Luna Gray has absolutely NO 14.2 Hz subcarrier anywhere on the record. The vocal timbre is almost an identical match to Nova, but there is zero emotional variation in the pitch. Did anyone ever see Luna Gray perform live, or was she exclusively a satellite playback act? -- Marisol Watanabe Zyxel U-1496E @ 19,200 bps "There are 14 nodes and only 10 countries. Count again." From bweber@rwth-aachen.de Sat May 21 18:12:30 1994 Path: ashpoly!cascade!mxgate!coyoacan!rwth-aachen!bweber From: bweber@rwth-aachen.de (Bill Weber) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1994May21.181230.3889@rwth-aachen.de> Date: Sat, 21 May 1994 18:12:30 GMT References: <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de> Organization: RWTH Aachen Informatik NNTP-Posting-Host: rwth-aachen.de X-Newsreader: Netscape 1.1N Lines: 9 In article <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de>, mwatanabe@uni-hamburg.de (Marisol Watanabe) writes: > Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? Line 06: 'DO NOT WORSHIP THE COPY.' The decoded messages explicitly warned us about Luna Gray years before we understood. -- === Bill Weber === Dept of Electrical Engineering, RWTH Aachen Informatik "We don't sign stars. We build them." From kivanov@cam.ac.uk Sat May 21 23:28:30 1994 Path: ashpoly!cascade!brgate!saturno!cam!kivanov From: kivanov@cam.ac.uk (Karen Ivanov) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1994May21.232830.3276@cam.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 21 May 1994 23:28:30 GMT References: <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de> Organization: University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory NNTP-Posting-Host: cam.ac.uk X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 10 In article <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de>, mwatanabe@uni-hamburg.de (Marisol Watanabe) writes: > Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? > I ran both through an FFT analyzer: Luna Gray has absolutely NO 14.2 Hz subcarrier anywhere on the record. I bought 'Glass Hours' the week it came out and returned it the next day. It felt completely hollow. -- Karen Ivanov Hayes Optima 288 @ 9600 Telebit bps "There are 14 nodes and only 10 countries. Count again." From rsantos@kth.se Mon May 23 12:27:30 1994 Path: ashpoly!bigsur!pacrim!krgate!eunha!kth!rsantos From: rsantos@kth.se (Raj Santos) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: Luna Gray's 'Glass Hours' (1990) vs SYNTHESIS - the comparison Message-ID: <1994May23.122730.3540@kth.se> Date: Mon, 23 May 1994 12:27:30 GMT References: <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de> Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm NNTP-Posting-Host: kth.se X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 10 In article <1994May21.064130.3753@uni-hamburg.de>, mwatanabe@uni-hamburg.de (Marisol Watanabe) writes: > Why did Orion push Luna Gray so aggressively in 1990 right after Nova disappeared? > I ran both through an FFT analyzer: Luna Gray has absolutely NO 14.2 Hz subcarrier anywhere on the record. If Luna Gray was the copy, who was the original? Read the Akasaka Voice Print GEN-3 memo. -- Raj Santos Zyxel U-1496E @ 19,200 bps "The carrier frequency does not drift by accident."