From jtakahashi@inria.fr Sun Dec 08 22:46:26 1996 Path: ashpoly!cascade!transat!eunet-de!hansebox!inria!jtakahashi From: jtakahashi@inria.fr (Jen Takahashi) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: [FLAME] The 14.2x slowdown voice on 'Memory Hatch' - myth vs reality Message-ID: <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 22:46:26 GMT Organization: INRIA Rocquencourt NNTP-Posting-Host: inria.fr X-Newsreader: Netscape 1.1N Lines: 11 Let's settle the 'voice under the voice' rumor once and for all. When you decimate the vocal stem down by 14.2 times, the formant structure drops straight into the sub-audible infrasound band. It doesn't sound like Nova. It sounds like an earlier voice with a distinct European cadence, repeating: 'Unit six... core wipe incomplete.' Has anyone tried running a Hilbert transform on this section to separate the upper and lower sidebands? -- Jen Takahashi "They will send a copy in my place." Decstation 5000/200 / FreeBSD 2.1 From aokonkwo@mit.edu Mon Dec 09 21:11:26 1996 Path: ashpoly!cascade!mxgate!coyoacan!mit!aokonkwo From: aokonkwo@mit.edu (Andrei Okonkwo) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: [FLAME] The 14.2x slowdown voice on 'Memory Hatch' - myth vs reality Message-ID: <1996Dec09.211126.9455@mit.edu> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 21:11:26 GMT References: <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr> Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology NNTP-Posting-Host: mit.edu X-Newsreader: Netscape 1.1N Lines: 8 In article <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr>, jtakahashi@inria.fr (Jen Takahashi) writes: > Let's settle the 'voice under the voice' rumor once and for all. Unit 6! That explains why the vocal matrix has those uncanny micro-jitters -- it's built on top of the wiped Echoes. -- Andrei Okonkwo Tape trading list upon request. SASE required for international mail. From cjohansson@cam.ac.uk Tue Dec 10 22:25:26 1996 Path: ashpoly!cascade!transat!eunet-fi!relcom!kiae!cam!cjohansson From: cjohansson@cam.ac.uk (Camila Johansson) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: [FLAME] The 14.2x slowdown voice on 'Memory Hatch' - myth vs reality Message-ID: <1996Dec10.222526.9516@cam.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:25:26 GMT References: <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr> Organization: University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory NNTP-Posting-Host: cam.ac.uk X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Lines: 9 In article <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr>, jtakahashi@inria.fr (Jen Takahashi) writes: > Let's settle the 'voice under the voice' rumor once and for all. Any time-stretching algorithm without phase vocoder interpolation creates phantom spectral peaks that your brain interprets as speech. -- Camila Johansson Opinions expressed are solely my own and not those of University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. ------------------------------------------------------------ From asouza@earthlink.net Wed Dec 11 10:17:26 1996 Path: ashpoly!cascade!transat!ukc!fennimore!earthlink!asouza From: asouza@earthlink.net (Astrid Souza) Newsgroups: alt.fan.nova-hart Subject: Re: [FLAME] The 14.2x slowdown voice on 'Memory Hatch' - myth vs reality Message-ID: <1996Dec11.101726.7930@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:17:26 GMT References: <1996Dec08.224626.6932@inria.fr> <1996Dec09.211126.9455@mit.edu> Organization: EarthLink Network NNTP-Posting-Host: earthlink.net X-Newsreader: Netscape 1.1N Lines: 10 In article <1996Dec09.211126.9455@mit.edu>, aokonkwo@mit.edu (Andrei Okonkwo) writes: > Unit 6! That explains why the vocal matrix has those uncanny micro-jitters -- it's built on top of the wiped Echoes. Unit 6! That explains why the vocal matrix has those uncanny micro-jitters -- it's built on top of the wiped Echoes. My 14.4k connection dropped twice trying to fetch this thread. Keep articles concise! -- Astrid Souza -- EarthLink Network "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary spectra."